Scientific American
-
[:es]Have We Mismeasured the Universe?[:]
[:es]New studies of the oldest light and sound in the cosmos suggest novel physics—rather than systematic errors—could explain an unsolved scientific mystery[:]
-
[:es]Advanced Extraterrestrials as an Approximation to God[:]
[:es]Our first encounter with E.T. technology could be as baffling to us as a smartphone would have been to a Neandertal[:]
-
[:es]The Cerebellum Is Your «Little Brain»—and It Does Some Pretty Big Things[:]
[:es]A newly identified circuit connecting the cerebellum to the brain’s reward centers in mice could help scientists understand autism and addiction[:]
-
[:es]Heavy Rains and Hurricanes Clear a Path for Supercharged Mold[:]
[:es]Warmer temperatures and rising CO2 can also ramp up some fungal toxins and allergens [:]
-
[:es]How Political Opinions Change[:]
[:es]A clever experiment shows it’s surprisingly easy to change someone’s political views, revealing how flexible we are[:]
-
[:es]From Pine Cones to Hobbit Holes, Mimicking Nature Can Help Humans Adapt to Wildfires[:]
[:es]Looking to fire-adapted trees and animals could reduce the impacts of California’s deadly blazes[:]
-
[:es]A String of Italian Earthquakes Hints at Forecasts for One Type of Quake[:]
[:es]The geology governing “sequence” quakes suggests scientists could, in theory, forecast the follow-up quakes[:]
-
[:es]No, Science Communicators Are Not Undermining Public Trust[:]
[:es]Thinking outside the box is a requirement in this attention economy if we want science to reach mass audiences[:]
-
[:es]The Danger of Judging Scientists by What They Discover[:]
[:es]Researchers follow the truth where it leads them, but study shows the personal costs[:]